Bush, in furtherance of his idiocy, vetoed the spending bill for Iraq.
Bush, in furtherance of his idiocy, vetoed the spending bill for Iraq.
What I want to know is WHY can't people (Republicans, in general) acknowledge that Iraq is getting WORSE not better?
- If Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11 (which is a FACT!), WHY is setting a time-table for withdrawal considered conceding to Al Queda?
- WHY, after FIVE YEARS, are there not enough Iraqi soldiers to police their own country? Was not part of the "mission" to help them help themselves?
- If five years is not sufficient time to help the Iraqi's gain control, WHY was Congress, as well as the American people, not informed of the long-term requirement? Is it because they KNEW it would not have been approved?
- How can Bush question the constitutionality of a legislative action regarding a time-table for withdrawal when an express power of Congress is the power to declare war?
- WHY cannot people (mainly Republicans) acknowledge that Iraq is getting WORSE not better?
No comments:
Post a Comment